In The Partly Cloudy
Patriot, Sarah Vowell creates a skeptical tone in order to demonstrate her
theme that a person’s degree of patriotism should not be affected by popular
events, but rather should remain at a constant level that a particular individual has
thoughtfully set. One way she creates a
skeptical tone is by dissecting the movie, The
Patriot, rather than fully-heartedly praising it like her fellow
Americans. Vowell presents a more
critical view of the film’s character, Benjamin Martin, by reading deeper into
his internal conflict of not wanting to fight the British because “he still
feels bad about chopping up some Cherokee into little pieces during the French
and Indian War.” She goes on to develop this
negative perspective on the beloved main character by foreseeing the inevitable
future circumstances that accompany any white male residing in the pre-civil
war south. She bleakly predicts that Benjamin Martin’s
newborn son will grow up to “rape their slaves and vote to be the first state
to secede from the Union”. This
unpopular take on this patriotic movie demonstrates Vowell’s bold, independent
nature and her refusal to blindly conform to societal trends, thus setting an
example for her audience. Vowell wants
to instruct young voters to be conscientious of their patriotism. She advises
them to not get caught up in the moment and blindly support their leaders. Vowell’s “ideal picture of citizenship will
always be an argument, not a sing-along,” because she will never sit back and
let her leaders dictate her life; Vowell will always exercise her right to
choose on every subject, even her right to choose whether or not to place a
mini American flag on her front lawn.
Therefore, she wants young people to exercise that same right and to
never stop thinking for themselves.
Vowell’s skeptical tone is effective in demonstrating her theme to her
audience.
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Sunday, September 18, 2016
Don't Let Battleships Lie in a Trench
In class this week, we discussed how the architects in "Postcards from the Trenches" utilize empty space to create a sense of absence at war memorials. According to the article, the presence of absence sufficiently represents the lost lives of dead and missing soldiers by visually demonstrating their literal absence from daily life. At the 1919 Peace Celebrations festival in Whitehall, England, absence had a visual and auditory presence when bands stopped playing as they passed the Cenotaph, marking the "place where a million British voices belonged". However, regardless of the thoughtful planning architects put into strategically creating a sense of absence, the effects do not always resonate accordingly with the viewer. A classmate who visited the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, Germany, reported that he did not even realize that the sight was in fact a memorial until he saw a sign labeling it. In this case, the architect's logical planning failed to emotionally touch the viewer. Therefore, despite the trend of constructing war memorials with the presence of quiet absence, I think that war memorials should represent the dead with colorful aliveness. Instead of names on walls and empty coffins, war memorials should display photographs, soldiers' handwritten letters, the pens they used to write those letters, their tattered clothes, mission plans--anything real and alive that forces the viewer to feel the human presence of the soldiers, in order to make their death just as jarring to him or her as it was to the soldier himself. War memorials should let life contradict death.
picture of Holocaust Memorial
picture of Holocaust Memorial
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
